PICAYUNE —
Color my neck red, but I often suspect some “progressives” are more interested in demonstrating moral superiority than winning elections. Vicarious participation in emotionally satisfying public spectacles renders them incapable of thinking about how presumptively unenlightened voters might react. And yes, I’m talking about you, MSNBC.
That woman holding a big sign for the TV cameras reading “I am a SLUT with a VAGINA, and I vote,” at a feminist pep rally in Michigan isn’t thinking about how badly President Obama needs her state’s electoral votes. Nor how close polls show the Michigan contest to be. She’s thinking about demonstrating her contempt for Republican legislators.
It rarely occurs to such people that they might be driving voters in the opposite direction — any more than it occurred to the dopes that showed up at early Tea Party rallies carrying guns. (Interesting how that’s stopped happening, isn’t it?) Their first principle, always and everywhere, is displaying their righteousness.
But more about Michigan’s genital nomenclature dispute later.
The countercultural left, of course, has enjoyed alienating drones since Woodstock. But hippies aren’t the problem today. Indeed, it’s the posturing of highly paid TV celebrities that has helped drive the Moral Indignation Wing of the Democratic Party into politically awkward positions in three critical swing states — at least two of which President Obama must win to be re-elected.
To fans of MSNBC’s evening political infotainment shows, three news stories have often eclipsed the presidential race for top billing all spring: the Scott Walker recall election in Wisconsin, the Trayvon Martin case in Florida, and Michigan’s semantic squabble over women’s naughty bits.
The network’s handling of all three has been somewhere between embarrassing and reprehensible. Hosts and guests have taken active, partisan roles every bit as objectionable as, say, Fox News’ Sean Hannity. In each case, their journalism has proven even worse than their political judgment. Democratic politicians would be wise to reconsider putting in face time on MSNBC.
Regarding Gov. Walker, there’s little left to say except that MSNBC savants persistently misjudged Wisconsin voters. Acting as partisan cheerleaders, they ignored polls showing that many voters felt about recalling Walker pretty much as most Americans felt about impeaching Bill Clinton — i.e., that a grave constitutional remedy shouldn’t be used to re-run an election. The anger of Wisconsin’s unions notwithstanding, voters also disliked being used as stage props. Fortunately, it appears the majority hasn’t yet confused Big Ed with Barack Obama.
Florida’s Trayvon Martin case has constituted perhaps the most egregious instance of journalistic malpractice since the selling of the Iraq War. For weeks at a time, MSNBC personalities Al Sharpton, Big Ed and Lawrence O’Donnell arrayed themselves as prosecutor, judge and jury — promoting a wildly inaccurate, racially inflammatory version of the tragedy for nightly consumption.
In MSNBC’s kangaroo court, neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman’s story that he was assaulted and beaten practically insensible before resorting to deadly force was reviled, mocked and lampooned. A murky film clip of Zimmerman in handcuffs was replayed a thousand times to show him supposedly injury-free. This went on for weeks.
Then when a police file was released proving Zimmerman had indeed suffered a broken nose and serious head wounds, something amazing happened. MSNBC not only failed to report these critical facts; it dropped the story altogether. Poof, gone! Hardly a word about Trayvon Martin has been broadcast by MSNBC’s crack team of racial provocateurs in weeks.
Now that Zimmerman’s freely given testimony to Sanford, Fla. police has emerged (the suspect was evidently too naive to lawyer-up) observers are left to wonder whether or not, absent media pressure from the likes of Sharpton, he ought to have been charged with a crime at all. (See defense specialist Jeralyn Merritt’s astringent analysis at talkleft.com.)
Such disgraceful episodes do more to promote racial discord and alienate voters from the Democratic Party than it’s possible to say. To the extent he’s identified with the case, President Obama’s chances in Florida suffer.
Fortunately, MSNBC now has Michigan Rep. Lisa Brown’s now-famous genitalia to fill a programming void. “If you don’t like vaginas,” Lawrence O’Donnell told viewers, “this is not your TV show.”
Well, I wouldn’t go that far.
But I will say that Rep. Brown definitely asked for trouble, ending otherwise well-considered objections to a draconian anti-abortion bill with a childish joke: “I’m flattered you’re all so concerned about my vagina, but no means no.”
The adult response would have been pained silence. GOP legislators, however, played along, censuring Brown for 24 hours.
Daft progressives swung into action, summoning Eve Ensler, author of the tedious off-Broadway play “The Vagina Monologues” to the Michigan pep rally, giving right-thinking Democrats a swell chance to act morally superior while talking dirty on national TV.
And yes, I’m aware it’s a clinically appropriate term with a thousand inappropriate synonyms.
That doesn’t mean everybody’s got to talk about it.
(Arkansas Times columnist Gene Lyons can be emailed at eugenelyons2@yahoo.com)
Opinion
Righteous indignation bad tactics
- Opinion
-
-
Not your mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal
By Rheta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist
I haven’t seen the Ladies’ Home Journal in about a million years, except maybe in the dentist’s office when I was trying to avoid a television permanently set on Fox News.
Somebody’s grandchild was selling magazines for a school project, and Ladies’ Home Journal was the only one on the list I recognized. Now it comes to the house.
Let’s just say: It’s not my mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal. This month, right behind a feature called “A Country of People Who Never Stop Eating” is one called “Nice Girls Do Get Tattoos.” -
Health care market needs oversight
By Gene Lyons/Syndicated columnist
Sometimes the best journalism explains what’s right under our noses. In Steven Brill’s exhaustive Time magazine cover article, “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us,” it’s the staggeringly expensive, grotesquely inefficient and inhumane way Americans pay for medical care.
-
VA’s appalling failures not recent
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
While recent national press attention to ongoing problems at Mississippi’s G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Veterans Administration Medical Center in Jackson is welcome and needed, the failures of the overall VA service apparatus in Mississippi are not recent problems.
In short, former U.S. Rep. Sonny Montgomery — Mississippi’s “Mr. Veteran” and author of the modern G.I. Bill that bears his name — must be spinning in his grave. There have been significant failures and poor service to veterans documented by state and local media since 2008. -
Dolley Madison politically savvy
By Cokie and Steven V. Roberts/Syndicated columnists
When Dolley Payne Madison became first lady in 1809, she instituted Wednesday evening gatherings at the White House where political rivals could meet and talk. They were called “squeezes” because so many people showed up and crowded the room. As Cokie wrote in her book “Ladies of Liberty": “All were welcome as long as they were appropriately dressed. And all went — skipping a Wednesday night might mean missing a vital piece of political information or being left out of a crucial deal.”
-
Mississippi isn’t immune from national college tuition trends
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
Higher education in Mississippi has not been immune from national trends cited in a recent Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report which concludes that over the last five years, the global economic downturn and a “no new taxes” political climate have increasingly shifted the burden of higher education finance to students and parents at a time when enrollment is increasing and the percentage of state support is decreasing. -
Right to vote not ‘racial entitlement
By Donna Brazile/Syndicated columnist
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. Holder — a challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, specifically Section 5, which requires states and localities with a history of voting discrimination against racial and language minorities to get “pre-approved” by the federal government before changing how elections are conducted or voters are registered. -
1st day of spring brings memories
By Wyatt Emmerich/Southside Sun
The first day of spring! My favorite month, April, is just around the corner. Now we just need one big gullywasher to get rid of the pine pollen.
Normally, spring gives me a strong sense of rebirth and renewal, but this spring I seem surrounded by moments crystallizing the passage of time.
It was a year ago, I walked up the porch to my mother’s home to box up her possessions following her funeral. -
Soaking up in tiger paw-shaped hot tub
By Rheta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist
No springtime ritual was better at Auburn than sitting on hard rocks at a nearby state park to let cold water rush over your feet. You wore cut-off blue jeans and Dr. Scholl’s sandals, the unofficial uniform for coeds in the 1970s, and when you left, you felt ready to tackle tests, term papers and blind dates.
-
Medicaid or not, costs will be paid
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
While the battle continues between state Republicans and other fiscal conservatives intent on focusing on the long-terms costs of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act and Democrats, health care advocates and state hospitals intent on focusing on the short-term benefits, the fact remains that one way or another, the costs of providing health care for the poor, the blind, the aged and the disabled will be paid by the taxpayers one way or another.
-
Multiculturalism is not rational
By Thomas Sowell/Syndicated columnist
Among the many irrational ideas about racial and ethnic groups that have polarized societies over the centuries and around the world, few have been more irrational and counterproductive than the current dogmas of multiculturalism.
Intellectuals who imagine that they are helping racial or ethnic groups that lag behind by redefining their lags out of existence with multicultural rhetoric are in fact leading them into a blind alley. - More Opinion Headlines
-
Not your mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal




