STARKVILLE —
The political stakes were high for former Gov. Haley Barbour and Attorney General Jim Hood as the state Supreme Court unveiled their 6-3 decision regarding the constitutionality of Barbour’s end of term pardons, reprieves, clemencies and medical discharges for more than 200 people.
But in the end, the state’s highest court upheld the constitutionality of Barbour’s decisions with the majority opinion making the argument that the Mississippi’s gubernatorial pardons are not reviewable and that judicial interference in the pardons represented a separation of powers conflict.
A review of the records by The Associated Press indicated that Barbour gave full pardons to 203 people, including “17 convicted of murder, 10 convicted of manslaughter, eight convicted of aggravated assault and five convicted of drunken-driving incidents that caused deaths.” Barbour additionally granted other forms of official mercy — full pardons, medical releases, indefinite suspension of sentence or conditional clemency — to 26 inmates who were still in state custody.
The rest — 189 in all — had already been released from prison well in advance of Barbour’s pardons.
Hood had pressed the case based on his contention that a constitutional public notice requirement has not been met. Writing for the majority, Justice Jess Dickinson said: “We are mindful that the victims and their families are entitled to be interested in the subject matter of this case, and they are undoubtedly — and understandably — concerned with its outcome.” But Dickinson concluded that in the opinion of the majority, only Barbour had the constitutional authority to decide if that public notice requirement had been satisfied.
The high court ruling comes just two days after the Mississippi Legislature saw efforts to change the state’s pardon laws died in the respective House and Senate committees. In reaction, Hood vowed to seek a ballot initiative to make the judicial branch responsible for enforcement of the public notice provision for pardons.
For Barbour, the ruling vindicates him of accusations of legal misconduct. As to public perception, the ruling does little to change the fact that some Mississippians are outraged about the pardons and for others it was a political non-event.
Hood comes out of the fray as popular as ever with his political base. The issue will serve him well and may even carry to the 2015 elections as an appeal to his supporters. Likewise, Hood’s detractors will find the spat with Barbour as another brick in the wall of mistrust they’ve built for Hood’s tenure as attorney general.
But it is in the state’s judicial elections where the decision may resonate long and loud. Judicial races in Mississippi have become targets for the national war over tort reform between business/medical interests and trial lawyers. “Soft on crime” is a label most often distorted in these affairs and this issue plays into that campaign scenario for either group that wants to throw the political rock.
Three Supreme Court justices face re-election bids in 2012 — Chief Justice Bill Waller, Justice Mike Randolph and Justice Leslie King. A fourth, Justice George Carlson, has announced his intention to retire and his seat on the bench will be an open seat in the 2012 elections.
Randolph, who was appointed to the high court, joined Waller and Justice Randy Pierce in dissent from the majority opinion upholding the Barbour pardons. Clearly, the remaining justices who joined Dickinson and Carlson in support of the majority opinion run the significant political risk of seeing campaign ads targeting their vote on the Barbour pardons decision during their next re-election bids.
Gubernatorial pardons have not been politicized in Mississippi in over a half-century. But the process will remain under a microscope for years to come regardless the outcome of this case.
Bottom line: Looking for a gubernatorial pardon in Mississippi any time soon? Good luck with that.
(Sid Salter is a syndicated columnist. Contact him at 601-507-8004 or sidsalter@sidsalter.com)
Opinion
Barbour may impact politics
- Opinion
-
-
Hood’s ‘open carry’ ruling strikes important balances
Attorney General Jim Hood’s office issued an opinion this week that went a long way toward establishing some order and applying some common sense to what has become a contentious and confusing debate both for proponents and opponents of free exercise of the Second Amendment.
House Bill 2, which becomes law July 1, was authored and led to passage by state Rep. Andy Gipson, R-Braxton. Gipson has told the press that he believed the legislation was necessary to clearly define what a concealed weapon is under the law and to distinguish between “concealed carry” and “open carry” rights. But many law enforcement officers charged with enforcing the state’s “concealed carry” law and other contradictory statutes, the bill created some confusion and Hood’s AG opinion brought some clarity to the ongoing debate. -
Analysis: Miss. supes discussing county budgets
Mississippi supervisors gather on the Gulf Coast this week to talk about roads and bridges, economic development, water resources and other issues.
-
The Loss of Trust
Amid all the heated cross-currents of debate about the National Security Agency’s massive surveillance program, there is a growing distrust of the Obama administration that makes weighing the costs and benefits of the NSA program itself hard to assess. The belated recognition of this administration’s contempt for the truth, for the American people and for the Constitution of the United States, has been long overdue.
-
Mary Dorsa Guttry
Mass of Christian Burial for Mary Dorsa Guttry, 90, of Carriere, Miss., who passed away Friday, June 14, 2013, will be held Wednesday, June 19, 2013, at 2 p.m. at St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church.
Visitation will be Wednesday, June 19, 2013 from 11 a.m. until 1 p.m. at McDonald Funeral Home.
Burial will be in New Palestine Cemetery under the direction of McDonald Funeral Home. -
We all need to be prepared for disasters
When my father was alive, he left New Orleans only two times in his life. The first was to serve his country in Korea. The second was when the federal government evacuated him to San Antonio in 2005.
-
How much spying needed for security?
Ever since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, Americans have vacillated between their desire for safety and their desire for privacy.
The federal government, whose spying on its own citizens has been further exposed this past week, says Americans can’t have it both ways. -
State lags in early child ed
The bad news is that Mississippi remains the only state in the South without a state-funded early children education program. Only eight states nationwide do not invest in some form of early childhood education and only 11 states don’t have a state-funded pre-kindergarten program.
-
A hard rain is gonna fall...
By Kathryn Jean Lopez/Syndicated columnist
After disappearing during his term in office and bringing scandal to his family and state, former South Carolina governor Mark Sanford is going to Washington, having won election to Congress. And that’s far from the worst story reflecting the current character of our nation.
-
Not your mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal
By Rheta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist
I haven’t seen the Ladies’ Home Journal in about a million years, except maybe in the dentist’s office when I was trying to avoid a television permanently set on Fox News.
Somebody’s grandchild was selling magazines for a school project, and Ladies’ Home Journal was the only one on the list I recognized. Now it comes to the house.
Let’s just say: It’s not my mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal. This month, right behind a feature called “A Country of People Who Never Stop Eating” is one called “Nice Girls Do Get Tattoos.” -
Health care market needs oversight
By Gene Lyons/Syndicated columnist
Sometimes the best journalism explains what’s right under our noses. In Steven Brill’s exhaustive Time magazine cover article, “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us,” it’s the staggeringly expensive, grotesquely inefficient and inhumane way Americans pay for medical care.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Hood’s ‘open carry’ ruling strikes important balances




