Obama’s realpolitik strategy

Opinion

June 21, 2012

Obama’s realpolitik strategy

By Gene Lyons/Syndicated columnist The Picayune Item Picayune Item Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:23 PM CDT

PICAYUNE — There’s a definite Catch-22 aspect to the presidency. Anybody crazy enough to want the job probably shouldn’t be allowed to have it. That said, anybody who thought Barack Obama was going to deal with terrorists by sending flowers and proposing group therapy is certainly naive enough to work for the Nobel Peace Prize committee.

Sweet reason never works with religious fanatics. When Obama criticized the Bush administration’s “false choice between our safety and our ideals” in 2009, he was mainly talking about torture and Guantanamo. The notorious concentration camp remains open because he ducked a confrontation with congressional Republicans determined to portray him as soft on terror.

Easy on al-Qaida, however, this president is not. See, it turns out that there’s a paradoxical aspect to disengaging from Iraq and Afghanistan, too. A recent front-page story in The New York Times about Obama’s personally selecting targets for drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan puts it this way: “War is a messy business, and his actions show that pursuing an enemy unbound by rules has required moral, legal and practical trade-offs that his speeches did not envision.” (“Secret ‘Kill List’ Tests Obama’s Principles and Will,” May 29, Jo Becker and Scott Shane)

Maybe not. But then with the famous exception of Winston Churchill on warning Britain on the eve of Dunkirk that he had “nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat,” politicians’ speeches almost never do.

Based upon interviews with three dozen current and former White House aides, the Times depicts the president as a cool realist who “approves lethal action without hand-wringing,” using his “lawyering skills ... to enable, not constrain, his ferocious campaign against al-Qaida — even when it comes to killing an American cleric [Anwar al-Awlaki] in Yemen, a decision that Mr. Obama told colleagues was ‘an easy one.’”

Obama appears to have concluded what any bloody-minded pragmatist would: That a second mass casualty terrorist strike against the U.S. would not only lead to innocent deaths, but change the nation’s politics profoundly. Think how 9/11 sent the Bush administration blundering into Iraq. A third strike, and we’d find ourselves living on a different planet — terrorism’s goal.

Thus, “surgical” drone attacks, eviscerating al-Qaida’s leadership even as ground troops exit Muslim countries. Aides helpfully told the Times that, as a student of Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, Obama believes it’s his duty to assume direct personal responsibility — moral, military and political.

Ancient theologians aside, the article itself, which couldn’t have been written without White House cooperation, definitely shows that the president has laid it all on the line.

The feebleness of his critics makes that doubly clear. Sen. John McCain complains that the purpose of White House leaks is to “enhance President Obama’s image as a tough guy for the elections.”

Um, yes. And your point, Senator?

The libertarian left, in the person of Salon’s influential Glenn Greenwald, objects to “access journalism” in which reporters help “government officials to propagandize the citizenry ... from behind the protective shield of anonymity.”

Anonymity? Having broken my own pick with The New York Times over its disgraceful Whitewater and Iraq coverage, I nevertheless counted 14 high-ranking named sources in the article in question. They included John Brennan, the 25-year CIA veteran who is Obama’s go-to-guy on al-Qaida.

“The purpose of these actions is to mitigate threats to U.S. persons’ lives,” Brennan said. “It is the option of last recourse. So the president, and I think all of us here, don’t like the fact that people have to die. And so he wants to make sure that we go through a rigorous checklist: The infeasibility of capture, the certainty of the intelligence base, the imminence of the threat, all of these things.”

Writing in The Guardian, Greenwald accuses the Times of omitting “any discussion of many of the most controversial aspects of Obama’s policies ... the number of civilian deaths caused by Obama’s drone strikes, and the way those drone attacks have strengthened al-Qaida by increasing anti-American hatred.”

Troubling, if true. Alas, none of these allegations survives even a cursory reading of Jo Becker and Scott Shane’s 6,000 word epic. The authors quote Cameron P. Munter, Obama’s ambassador to Pakistan, complaining that “he didn’t realize his main job was to kill people.”

“Drones,” they write, “have replaced Guantanamo as the recruiting tool of choice for militants; in his 2010 guilty plea, Faisal Shahzad, who had tried to set off a car bomb in Times Square, justified targeting civilians by telling the judge, ‘When the drones hit, they don’t see children.’”

As even Greenwald concedes, sources are quoted bitterly criticizing the tendency to declare all military-aged men in the “strike zone” terrorists, although one anonymous source provides context: “Al-Qaida is an insular, paranoid organization — innocent neighbors don’t hitch-hike rides in the back of trucks headed for the border with guns and bombs.”

Longer term, Obama’s actions could obviously cause unintended bad consequences. Right now, however, real-world alternatives seem in perishingly short supply.

(Arkansas Times columnist Gene Lyons can emailed at eugenelyons2@yahoo.com)

Text Only

Opinion

Not your mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal
By Rheta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist

I haven’t seen the Ladies’ Home Journal in about a million years, except maybe in the dentist’s office when I was trying to avoid a television permanently set on Fox News.
Somebody’s grandchild was selling magazines for a school project, and Ladies’ Home Journal was the only one on the list I recognized. Now it comes to the house.
Let’s just say: It’s not my mother’s Ladies’ Home Journal. This month, right behind a feature called “A Country of People Who Never Stop Eating” is one called “Nice Girls Do Get Tattoos.”

March 29, 2013
Health care market needs oversight
By Gene Lyons/Syndicated columnist

Sometimes the best journalism explains what’s right under our noses. In Steven Brill’s exhaustive Time magazine cover article, “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us,” it’s the staggeringly expensive, grotesquely inefficient and inhumane way Americans pay for medical care.

March 29, 2013
VA’s appalling failures not recent
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist

While recent national press attention to ongoing problems at Mississippi’s G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Veterans Administration Medical Center in Jackson is welcome and needed, the failures of the overall VA service apparatus in Mississippi are not recent problems.
In short, former U.S. Rep. Sonny Montgomery — Mississippi’s “Mr. Veteran” and author of the modern G.I. Bill that bears his name — must be spinning in his grave. There have been significant failures and poor service to veterans documented by state and local media since 2008.

March 27, 2013
Dolley Madison politically savvy
By Cokie and Steven V. Roberts/Syndicated columnists

When Dolley Payne Madison became first lady in 1809, she instituted Wednesday evening gatherings at the White House where political rivals could meet and talk. They were called “squeezes” because so many people showed up and crowded the room. As Cokie wrote in her book “Ladies of Liberty": “All were welcome as long as they were appropriately dressed. And all went — skipping a Wednesday night might mean missing a vital piece of political information or being left out of a crucial deal.”

March 27, 2013
Mississippi isn’t immune from national college tuition trends
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
Higher education in Mississippi has not been immune from national trends cited in a recent Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report which concludes that over the last five years, the global economic downturn and a “no new taxes” political climate have increasingly shifted the burden of higher education finance to students and parents at a time when enrollment is increasing and the percentage of state support is decreasing.

March 23, 2013
Right to vote not ‘racial entitlement
By Donna Brazile/Syndicated columnist
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. Holder — a challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, specifically Section 5, which requires states and localities with a history of voting discrimination against racial and language minorities to get “pre-approved” by the federal government before changing how elections are conducted or voters are registered.

March 23, 2013
1st day of spring brings memories
By Wyatt Emmerich/Southside Sun

The first day of spring! My favorite month, April, is just around the corner. Now we just need one big gullywasher to get rid of the pine pollen.
Normally, spring gives me a strong sense of rebirth and renewal, but this spring I seem surrounded by moments crystallizing the passage of time.
It was a year ago, I walked up the porch to my mother’s home to box up her possessions following her funeral.

March 22, 2013
Soaking up in tiger paw-shaped hot tub
By Rheta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist

No springtime ritual was better at Auburn than sitting on hard rocks at a nearby state park to let cold water rush over your feet. You wore cut-off blue jeans and Dr. Scholl’s sandals, the unofficial uniform for coeds in the 1970s, and when you left, you felt ready to tackle tests, term papers and blind dates.

March 22, 2013
Medicaid or not, costs will be paid
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist

While the battle continues between state Republicans and other fiscal conservatives intent on focusing on the long-terms costs of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act and Democrats, health care advocates and state hospitals intent on focusing on the short-term benefits, the fact remains that one way or another, the costs of providing health care for the poor, the blind, the aged and the disabled will be paid by the taxpayers one way or another.

March 20, 2013
Multiculturalism is not rational
By Thomas Sowell/Syndicated columnist

Among the many irrational ideas about racial and ethnic groups that have polarized societies over the centuries and around the world, few have been more irrational and counterproductive than the current dogmas of multiculturalism.
Intellectuals who imagine that they are helping racial or ethnic groups that lag behind by redefining their lags out of existence with multicultural rhetoric are in fact leading them into a blind alley.

March 20, 2013
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Obama’s realpolitik strategy

Site Map

Contact Us