PICAYUNE —
Editor:
For too long as a state, we’ve been baited by pundits and politicians alike into a false sense of self-sufficiency. While Mississippi is indeed a charitable state, we receive our share of charity as well. That’s why Sid Salters characterization last week of Medicaid as a “ticking time bomb” is both puzzling and disturbing to me. I don’t know about you, but the thought of a ticking time bomb brings nothing positive to my mind. The constant campaign of mistruths, half-truths and outright lies about Medicaid continues to further the theme that Medicaid is a curse and not the blessing that it really is to this state. Medicaid, without a doubt, is one of the surest job creators we have.
When most people think about Medicaid, they immediately think about it as health insurance for the poor-- which to a great degree it is. Medicaid only serves the most vulnerable citizens of our state: the elderly, disabled, pregnant women and children. However, there must be health care professionals and facilities to provide this much needed care.
Additionally, these federal Medicaid funds are used to help support hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, drug stores and overall business activity. As Medicaid expands to meet our needs, the increased economic activity will lead to higher state and local revenues which will offset much, if not all, of the new state costs that keep Salter awake at night. I
The $1.7 billion state costs that Salter alludes to comes from a study done by the Milliman Group last year. This figure assumes that when the Medicaid expansion begins in 2014, 100 percent of Medicaid eligible people will join the program. Politely put, this assumption is a joke. With barriers such as face-to-face certification, it’s difficult enough to enroll eligible children now. A 2010 Kaiser Foundation Report showed that between the years of 2014 and 2019, Mississippi would payout $429 to $581 million dollars, while receiving $9.9 to $11.0 billion in new federal revenue. The new federal funds will exceed state costs by about 20 to 1. With a ratio like that, it’s fiscal insanity not to invest in Medicaid.
Salter falsely assesses Medicaid as an economic time bomb because he fails to recognize the multiplier effect of a multi-billion dollar increase in federal funds and the beneficial effects of insurance coverage for hundreds of thousands of Mississippians. The increased state costs that Mississippi will have to pay will be largely if not completely offset by the state and local revenue generated by the new federal funding, its related economic spinoffs and by the reductions in uncompensated care costs. There comes a time when we have to stop allowing those who know the truth to stop using Medicaid as a political wedge. We can’t continue to rail against Medicaid while happily accepting the economic benefit our state so heartily enjoys because of it.
Roy Mitchell
Executive Director, Mississippi Health Advocacy Program
Jackson, MS
Letters
Salter’s Medicaid “Time Bomb” is an Economic Boom for Mississippi
- Letters
-
-
Palazzo's stand on disaster relief embarrassing
Dear editor,
U.S. Rep. Steven Palazzo's recent vote against funding to pay flood insurance claims of Sandy victims should provoke embarrassment and disgust in Mississippians irrespective of individual politics. -
Letter to the Editor
Editor:
I would like to address the problem of unwanted animals being dumped in rural areas within the county. To those animal owners that do not want their animals anymore, for whatever reason; please be responsible and try to find a new home for your animal. -
Letter to the Editor
Never in the history of our nation has a president been reelected who has caused 23 million unemployed, 6 trillion of debt and a certainty that his policies will continue on steroids. Economics 101 would refute these policies. He told his followers to “vote for revenge.”
-
We need checks and balances
Dear Editor,
Never in the history of our nation has a president been reelected who has caused 23 million unemployed, 6 trillion of debt and a certainty that his policies will continue on steroids. Economics 101 would refute these policies -
Butler Now contract raises questions
Dear Editor:
The new contract with Butler Snow creates many unanswered questions. First, after pleading poverty before and during the budget hearings, why is it necessary to spend over $450,000 dollars to hire a firm to do what we already pay the supervisors to do? It’s obvious that the taxpayer was the least considered party to this one-sided contract. Once again, the supervisors have validated one of the 5 characteristics of government. “The few who pay taxes are simply a source of revenue to fund the socialist policies of politicians and their politically connected cronies.” -
letter to the editor
Editor;
I had long feared that Obama would be reelected to a 2nd term due to his policies that inordinately benefitted and increased the size of the dependency class -— who would then overwhelmingly vote for him. -
Need to thank Mississippi farmers
Editor:
As a member of the agricultural community that provides food and fiber for the 98% of the population that is not involved in farming, I want to thank all of you for your support of this most vital industry in Mississippi. -
Letter to the Editor
Editor: I had a nightmare that I was in the middle of a presidential election.
-
Letter to the Editor
Editor;
Gene Lyons is a master of inneundo and obfuscation as illustrated in his column in the August 30th Item. He starts off by intimating that Mitt Romney lies a lot and then cites 2 probable lies and 1 direct accusation of lying. That’s a total of 3. -
letter to the editor
Editor:
Was the reverse 911 used to warn county residents about the flooding danger. I experienced this first hand at 2:30 a.m. while bringing my wife to work in Picayune. I started to investigate and get the word out to media outlets and the only one to pick up on this was WGNO TV in NOLA. - More Letters Headlines
-
Palazzo's stand on disaster relief embarrassing




