JACKSON, Miss. —
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that seeks to strike down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
Leaders from Shelby County, Ala., are suing the U.S. Justice Department in an effort to end the practice of preclearance, which requires states under Section 5 authority to seek approval from the Justice Department for any changes to election-related laws such as redistricting or moving polling places. This could be a landmark case with significant impact on Mississippi.
While the Supreme Court has heard several challenges to preclearance practices of the Voting Rights Act over the years, it has never come close to striking down Section 5. However, in 2009 while voting 8-1 to uphold Section 5, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the section raises “serious constitutional questions” and “must be justified by current needs.” Many legal scholars believe that this signals a growing shift toward a majority of the justices’ willingness to seriously consider doing away with preclearance requirements.
In fact, some of those same legal scholars say that the Court’s decision to merely hear the case signals that Section 5 is in danger of being struck down.
While we won’t get into trying to predict what the Supreme Court will do, we sincerely hope that it leaves Section 5 intact. This state and this nation have come a long way, but preclearance requirements still serve a valuable purpose and should be allowed to do so.
However, we agree with Roberts that Section 5 does raise serious questions, and we agree with those who point out some of the disadvantages of preclearance that need addressing.
Local governments are almost helpless when it comes to making commonsense decisions related to something as simple as addressing deficiencies in a polling place because the cost to seek any kind of preclearance is more than most local budgets can bear. ...
Individual municipalities and counties can already seek exemptions — called bailouts — from Section 5 requirements. In fact, the number of bailouts granted have increased significantly over the recent years. The Obama Administration has awarded more exemptions since 2008 than any previous administration. ...
Section 5 can be best tested through the continued pursuit of exemptions, but for now, we hope the U.S. Supreme Court will let it stand. The need is not nearly as great as when Section 5 was originally adopted, but a need still does exist.
Online:
http://www.clarionledger.com
Editorials
Section 5 should remain in voting law
- Editorials
-
-
DOJ’s seizure of phone records is appalling
By The Vicksburg Post:
In today’s Department of Justice, the ends seem to justify the means.
And it is sickening. -
Bryant tantrum on education major standards was misguided
By the (McComb) Enterprise-Journal:
That was quite a tantrum Gov. Phil Bryant pitched at the College Board recently, criticizing its members for voicing concerns about his effort to increase standards for education majors. -
Legislature to City Hall not sure move
Five Mississippi House members are running for mayor this year, and while name recognition might provide some advantage, lawmakers have had a mixed record in trying to go from the Capitol to City Hall.
-
Nation’s economy improving, but state’s still lagging
By The (Jackson) Clarion-Ledger
It’s been a long time coming, but finally there are bright economic signs nationally that seem here to stay a while. -
Armed teachers dangerous idea for school safety
By (Columbus) The Commercial Dispatch:
The Mississippi House of Representatives sent back to the Senate a bill that would arm teachers.
Before sending it over, the House, by a 70-46 vote, amended the Senate’s bill in two major ways. Actually, the House did more than amend it. They neutered it. -
Not every bill grabs headlines
The first two bills that Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed during the 2013 legislative session dealt with money.
House Bill 19 gave more cash to the agency that coordinates a program to put all emergency offices under the same digital communications system. House Bill 20 moved money from the car tag reduction fund to the Budget Contingency Fund. Lawmakers use the contingency fund to cobble together cash for the overall state budget. -
Transparency key to ‘best watchdogs’ oversight
By The (Tupelo) Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal:
Rep. Jerry Turner’s effort to require open meetings of water associations and notice of meetings in which members of boards of directors will be elected remains alive in the Legislature. It should be enacted in the interests of transparency in the running of the nonprofit associations providing water for a significant percentage of Mississippi’s population. -
Miss. makes news, good news, this time
By The (Columbus) Commercial Dispatch:
Generally, when Mississippi makes national news — especially of late — it is not the sort of notoriety we welcome. ...
So March 3, when Mississippi again made national news, we braced ourselves for the embarrassment that was sure to follow.
Only this time, it wasn’t anything to be embarrassed about.
Imagine that. -
Ag’s legal expenses top $2.4M for year
An ongoing lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s foster care system has cost the state at least $4.4 million in legal expenses and fees since 2008.
Expenses continue to rise as the plaintiffs and the state work toward a telephone status conference scheduled for April 25 with U.S. District Judge Tom S. Lee. The price tag this year is $1.35 million. -
Ag’s legal expenses top $2.4M for year
An ongoing lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s foster care system has cost the state at least $4.4 million in legal expenses and fees since 2008.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
DOJ’s seizure of phone records is appalling




