A moral issue of supreme relevance

Columns

May 21, 2009

By William Murchison Picayune Item Thu May 21, 2009, 02:22 PM CDT

All the most interesting issues are moral in character, having to do with how we behave and why. The most interesting story of the past week — with due respect to Nancy Pelosi and other outliers — had to do with abortion, a moral issue of very supreme relevance, no matter of the depth or nature of one’s views on the matter. There was first of all a Gallup Poll. Then there was a presidential visit to Notre Dame University.

Polls never prove anything. At best, they point, but that’s something. The Gallup Poll I have in mind pointed to a growing unease about abortion — a sense of wait-a-second-here-what-are-we-doing?

The poll said, for the first time since 1995, when Gallup began asking the question, a majority of Americans — 51 percent — identify themselves as pro-life. Last year it was 44 percent. Moreover, “about as many Americans now say [abortion] should be illegal all circumstances (23 percent) as say it should be legal under any circumstance (22 percent).”

Leave it there for the moment. What of Notre Dame and its invitation to President Obama, the country’s most visible backer of abortion rights, to deliver the commencement address? What, specifically, of the strenuous and very public objections that many Roman Catholic leaders, including bishops, raised to the idea of a Catholic university’s offering an abortion backer honors and access? Not such decisive objections that the president stayed away, because he did come and speak. Not such objections as made him rethink his position, because he didn’t. Objections, nonetheless, that help define and clarify our main modern moral debate.

Clarify it how? In terms of what’s to be said for the pro-abortion position. Answer: nothing new and not much. The President’s speech in general wasn’t a bad one. It had good applause lines about living “as one human family” with “fair-minded words” for each other while engaging “hearts and minds.”

For the turmoil over what is owed unborn human life on — a moral perplexity for which the federal government, via Roe v. Wade, bears major responsibility — the President offered no solution, no cure. He acknowledged that “at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable.” He prescribed, among other things, the prevention of unintended pregnancies, more adoption, “care and support” for women, and “respect for the equality of women.” Quality boilerplate, all of it, for cover exit cover as the speaker moved past things he preferred not talking about.

Two points here: 1) The President attempted no moral pushback against the moral arguments of the other side; but, then, 2) no one else attempts it anymore. No one, that is, outside the fever swamps inhabited by the likes of NARAL Pro-Choice America, where the mere questioning of a woman’s right to abort is tantamount to confession of moral insensitivity, if not primitive chauvinism.

Politics, that strange pursuit in which the issue of abortion should never have been immersed to begin with, provides no solutions here. From the political standpoint, there’s really nothing to be said, other than what the President said. What has to be said, and is said at more normal levels of life, is that we’ve got a big problem here, irreconcilable by the norms of public engagement.

That leaves morality — the view of life through lenses other than those provided by people who make their livings on the public payroll. The Gallup Poll is evidence of something that may be going on, morally speaking: shifts in conviction, in outlook, in belief. What kinds of shifts? The kind that could turn the nation back once more to the broad conviction it shared prior to the 1960s? The conviction that human life — for that’s what it is — deserves at least as deep concern as free-range chicken and migrating salmon receive in an age of extraordinary anxieties?

We’ll see. Meanwhile, let’s not underestimate the kind of moral reasoning the President ducked at Notre Dame. It’s deep; it’s old. And it’s been known to have amazing effects.

Text Only

Columns

Hood loses hired counsel fight
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
The impact on John Q. Public from the passage of the so-called “sunshine law” regarding the implementation of restrictions and oversight of the hiring of outside counsel attorneys by the Mississippi Attorney General’s office has been vastly overstated by Attorney General Jim Hood and, to a degree, by Hood’s Republican political antagonists who passed the law over his objections.

May 26, 2012
Remembering war dead on Memorial Day
By Wyatt Emmerich/Northside Sun The photo of Billy Elmore has always haunted me. It pops up every now and then as my computer screen rotates through thousands of stored photos.

May 26, 2012
‘Calico Joe’ evokes memories
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
The new “small” novel “Calico Joe” — John Grisham’s much-anticipated paean to the game of baseball — was the perfect traveling companion on a long drive from Mississippi to Fayetteville, Ark., to witness my niece’s graduation from the University of Arkansas last week.

May 19, 2012
Is there a censored race war?
Thomas Sowell/Syndicated columnist
When two white newspaper reporters for the Virginian-Pilot were driving through Norfolk, and were set upon and beaten by a mob of young blacks — beaten so badly that they had to take a week off from work — that might seem to have been news that should have been reported, at least by their own newspaper. But it wasn’t.

May 19, 2012
The virtues of grunt work
By Cokie and Steven V. Roberts/Syndicated columnists
Occasionally a really bad idea gains currency and credibility. Here’s one: College students who work at unpaid internships are unfairly exploited by money-grubbing capitalists. In fact, goes this argument, the whole system is not only immoral but probably illegal and should be abolished.

May 19, 2012
Once, there were no words
By Rhetta Grimsely Johnson/Syndicated columnist
No matter how many times I stand in front of a group to speak, I get nervous. One of the reasons I went into print journalism was because I figured I’d never have to do any public speaking or wear grown-up clothes.

May 19, 2012
‘Finding Your Roots’ good show
By Cal Thomas/Syndicated Columnist
“Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates Jr.” is another of the Harvard professor’s wonderful television series for PBS. This is “must-see TV” and a more than worthy sequel to three previous projects Gates has hosted about how some of us came to be what and who we are.

May 17, 2012
Moral duties in a muddied world
By Kathryn Jean Lopez/Syndicated columnist
In an election season in which the White House has instituted a policy that puts unprecedented limits on the constitutional right to freedom of religion, questions of conscience, duty and spiritual and moral obligation are of critical importance.

May 17, 2012
Colleges, development intertwined
By Sid Salter/Syndicated columnist
At his speech here to the movers and shakers in the Mississippi Delta’s business, agricultural, educational and political circles, Gov. Phil Bryant’s remarks were met with more than polite applause. Bryant, the mechanic’s son from Moorhead, understands the Delta region’s challenges as lessons from his boyhood.

May 16, 2012
Prolific circuit judge relieved of duty
By Wyatt Emmerich/Southside Sun
Relieving the best criminal judge of all his criminal cases is not the way to exercise responsibility as senior circuit judge. What on earth is Hinds County Senior Circuit Judge Tomie Green doing?

May 16, 2012
More Columns Headlines

Columns

Search Results

A moral issue of supreme relevance

Site Map

Contact Us